Skip to main content

Evidence for Anomalistic Correlations Between Human Behavior and a Random Event Generator: Result of an Independent Replication of a Micro-PK Experiment

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Walach, Harald, Horan, Majella, Hinterberger, Thilo, von Lucadou, Walter β€’ 2020 Current Era β€’ psychokinesis

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

Can your mind nudge a random number generator? This study sat 244 people before a fractal display driven by an electronic coin-flipper and asked them to mentally steer it. Researchers built a grid comparing physical variables (machine behavior) with psychological ones (participant experience). In real experiments, way more surprising correlations appeared than in controls β€” 307 versus ~200 expected by chance (p = .0177). The twist: researchers do not claim anyone pushed electrons with their mind. They suggest something weirder β€” minds and random machines becoming linked in a spooky, entanglement-like way without direct causation. The catch? This only appeared using a bigger analysis grid than originally planned; the original smaller grid failed to replicate. That post-hoc change is a real asterisk on an otherwise intriguing finding.

Research Notes

Fifth replication of von Lucadou's matrix-correlation micro-PK paradigm, reframing psi as non-causal systemic correlations analogous to quantum entanglement. The post-hoc change from the pre-registered analysis and failure to replicate the original smaller matrix temper the positive finding. Speaks directly to Controversy #8 (GCP/RNG) and the broader replication debate.

An independent replication of a micro-psychokinesis experiment tested whether anomalous correlations arise between human operator behavior and a Zener-diode random number generator. 244 participants (503 valid experiments) interacted with an RNG-driven fractal display using shift keys while intending to direct its movement. A 45Γ—45 Spearman correlation matrix crossing five physical and five psychological variables per subrun was compared between experimental and matched control runs via a 10,000-iteration permutation test. The experimental matrix contained 307 significant correlations (p < .1 two-sided) versus 200 in controls (chance expectation ~203), yielding p = .0177. Significance held across stricter thresholds and for the 27Γ—45 matrix but not for the original 18Γ—27 matrix. The authors interpret results as supporting non-causal entanglement-like correlations rather than direct psychokinetic influence.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Walach, Harald, Horan, Majella, Hinterberger, Thilo, von Lucadou, Walter (2020). Evidence for Anomalistic Correlations Between Human Behavior and a Random Event Generator: Result of an Independent Replication of a Micro-PK Experiment. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000199
BibTeX
@article{walach_2020_evidence,
  title = {Evidence for Anomalistic Correlations Between Human Behavior and a Random Event Generator: Result of an Independent Replication of a Micro-PK Experiment},
  author = {Walach, Harald and Horan, Majella and Hinterberger, Thilo and von Lucadou, Walter},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice},
  doi = {10.1037/cns0000199},
}