Skip to main content

Psychophysical Interactions with a Double-Slit Interference Pattern: Exploratory Evidence of a Causal Influence

⚑ Contested β†—
Radin, D.I, Wahbeh, H, Michel, L, Delorme, A β€’ 2021 Current Era β€’ psychokinesis

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

Can your mind mess with light just by paying attention? That is the wild question from this experiment at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, part of a long series (28 experiments across four labs since 1998) testing whether consciousness can influence a double-slit optical setup β€” the classic physics demo where light creates striped patterns. Twenty-five participants sat in a shielded room trying to mentally influence the pattern, with matched "nobody home" controls. The pre-planned analysis came up empty. But alternative analyses found striking results: one showed roughly 1-in-3,000 odds against chance, another flagged fringes at 1-in-100,000 odds. Controls? Dead flat. Temperature and vibration ruled out mundane causes. This pattern β€” planned test failing while exploratory analyses shine β€” captures the frustrating replication puzzle in this field. Participants got no feedback, testing pure attention, and their mood dropped as sessions dragged on. Publication was delayed eight years because the funder wanted his own analysis first.

Research Notes

Part of the IONS double-slit consciousness series (28 experiments across 4 labs since 1998). Unique among these studies for having a null planned analysis paired with significant exploratory results β€” a pattern that epitomizes the replication challenge in this research program. Directly addressed by Walleczek & von Stillfried (2019) critique. No real-time feedback provided (unlike earlier IONS double-slit studies), testing attention alone. Participant mood declined significantly across sessions (ρ = βˆ’0.295, p = 2 Γ— 10⁻⁢).

An experiment conducted from 2012 to 2013 at the Institute of Noetic Sciences explored possible psychophysical effects on a double-slit optical system. 25 participants focused attention toward or away from the slits in 250 planned sessions inside an electromagnetically shielded chamber. Matched sham sessions without observers served as controls. The planned analysis found no evidence for a psychophysical effect. Two exploratory analyses were then developed: a simplified spectral metric yielded a 3.4 sigma effect (p = 0.0003), and fringe visibility analysis showed 7 of 22 fringes above 2.3 sigma after FDR correction, with one at 4.3 sigma (p = 0.00001). Sham data showed uniformly null outcomes. Environmental artifact analyses (temperature, vibration) found no mundane explanations. The 8-year delay between data collection and publication was due to the study funder's request to withhold results pending his own analysis.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Radin, D.I, Wahbeh, H, Michel, L, Delorme, A (2021). Psychophysical Interactions with a Double-Slit Interference Pattern: Exploratory Evidence of a Causal Influence. Physics Essays. https://doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-34.1.79
BibTeX
@article{radin_2021_psychophysical,
  title = {Psychophysical Interactions with a Double-Slit Interference Pattern: Exploratory Evidence of a Causal Influence},
  author = {Radin, D.I and Wahbeh, H and Michel, L and Delorme, A},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {Physics Essays},
  doi = {10.4006/0836-1398-34.1.79},
}