Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor
๐ Original study โ๐ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
What if your brain somehow knows what's about to happen before it actually does? This study tested that wild idea by hooking up 20 volunteers to EEG sensors measuring brain waves at the back of the head (the visual processing area). Each person sat through 100 trials where a true random number generator โ basically an electronic coin flip that nobody could predict โ decided whether they'd see a bright flash or nothing. The researchers then looked at the brain's slow electrical shifts in the moments before the flash was randomly chosen. Here's where it gets really interesting: women's brains showed a statistically significant difference in activity roughly 1.4 to 0.8 seconds before the stimulus, as if anticipating what was coming. Men showed a weaker, opposite-direction trend. The gender gap itself was highly significant. And just to make sure the equipment wasn't producing a fluke, the researchers ran the same setup on a grapefruit wired up as a "sham brain" โ which, reassuringly, showed absolutely nothing. The authors connect this "presentiment" effect to the placebo effect, suggesting that if the body can somehow respond to future events, that retrocausal influence might partly explain why people improve just from expecting a treatment to work.
Research Notes
Unique bridge between presentiment research and placebo theory. Uses SCPs at visual cortex (Oz) rather than skin conductance, with true hardware RNG making stimuli unknowable during prestimulus period. Peak presentiment at ~1.4-0.8s pre-stimulus. Contributes to the presentiment/PAA evidence base (Controversy #3).
Experiment testing whether slow cortical potentials (SCPs) can differentiate before a randomly determined future stimulus, suggesting a retrocausal factor in the placebo effect. 20 adult volunteers (13 female, 7 male) each completed 100 trials; a hardware noise-based RNG selected flash vs. no-flash with equal probability. EEG at Oz was analyzed using 10,000-iteration randomized permutation tests. Females's SCPs significantly differentiated before stimulus onset (zpre=2.72, p=0.007; zmm=3.45, p=0.0006). Males showed a suggestive opposite-direction effect (zpre=-1.64, p=0.10). The gender difference was significant (z=3.08, p=0.002). A sham brain (grapefruit) control showed no effect.
Links
Related Papers
Extends
Same Research Program
Extended By
Cites
Cited By
- Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis โ Mossbridge, Julia (2012)
- Cross-Examining the Case for Precognition: Comment on Mossbridge and Radin (2018) โ Houran, James (2018)
- Sentiment and Presentiment in Twitter: Do Trends in Collective Mood "Feel the Future"? โ Radin, Dean I (2023)
- Let Your Eyes Predict: Prediction Accuracy of Pupillary Responses to Random Alerting and Neutral Sounds โ Tressoldi, Patrizio E (2011)
Companion
- Precognition as a Form of Prospection: A Review of the Evidence โ Mossbridge, Julia A (2018)
- Predictive Physiological Anticipation Preceding Seemingly Unpredictable Stimuli: An Update of Mossbridge et al.'s Meta-Analysis โ Duggan, Michael (2018)
- Experimental Investigation of Precognition in Yoga Practitioners โ Alibalaei, Hassan (2025)
- Parapsychological Phenomena as Examples of Generalized Nonlocal CorrelationsโA Theoretical Framework โ Walach, Harald (2014)
Also by these authors
Observer Influence on Quantum Interference: Testing the von Neumann-Wigner Consciousness-Collapse Theory
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
Quantum Aspects of the Brain-Mind Relationship: A Hypothesis with Supporting Evidence
More in Precognition
Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: the transparent Psi project
A Preregistered Multi-Lab Replication of Maier et al. (2014, Exp. 4) Testing Retroactive Avoidance
Perspectives on Precognition
Bem's 'Feeling the Future' (2011) Five Years Later: Its Impact on Scientific Literature
Feeling the Future: A Meta-Analysis of 90 Experiments on the Anomalous Anticipation of Random Future Events
๐ Cite this paper
Radin, Dean, Lobach, Eva (2007). Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.6243
@article{radin_2007_toward,
title = {Toward Understanding the Placebo Effect: Investigating a Possible Retrocausal Factor},
author = {Radin, Dean and Lobach, Eva},
year = {2007},
journal = {The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine},
doi = {10.1089/acm.2006.6243},
}