Skip to main content

FieldREG II: Consciousness Field Effects: Replications and Explorations

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Nelson, Roger D, Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Dobyns, York H, Bradish, G. Johnston β€’ 1998 Modern Era β€’ psychokinesis

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This follow-up put the original FieldREG idea to a proper test with a clear prediction: emotionally resonant settings (think sacred rituals and live music) should rattle random number generators more than boring ones (like business meetings). Twenty-one confirmatory trials delivered impressively β€” resonant venues hit a probability of about two in a million against chance, while mundane venues showed essentially nothing. The team explored forty more contexts, from sporting events to sacred sites, finding promising patterns everywhere people felt deeply connected. One quirky twist: mundane settings actually showed less randomness than expected. These results became the strongest pre-Global Consciousness Project evidence that collective mental states might genuinely influence physical systems.

Research Notes

Foundational paper connecting individual REG anomalies to group consciousness effects, directly foreshadowing the Global Consciousness Project. Provides the strongest pre-GCP evidence that collective mental states can influence random physical systems. Central to controversy #8 (GCP/RNG).

Building on 18 exploratory FieldREG applications, a testable hypothesis was formulated: environments fostering intense subjective resonance would produce larger anomalous deviations in portable random event generators than pragmatic assemblies. Twenty-one confirmatory replications strongly supported this hypothesis, with resonant venues yielding p = 2.2 Γ— 10⁻⁢ while mundane venues yielded p = 0.91. Trial-based effect sizes were small but consistent (Et = 0.0049–0.0077). Forty additional explorations across sacred sites, rituals, music performances, sporting events, and global events identified further promising contexts. Mundane venues showed suggestive variance suppression (combined p = 0.019).

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Nelson, Roger D, Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Dobyns, York H, Bradish, G. Johnston (1998). FieldREG II: Consciousness Field Effects: Replications and Explorations. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{nelson_1998_fieldreg2,
  title = {FieldREG II: Consciousness Field Effects: Replications and Explorations},
  author = {Nelson, Roger D and Jahn, Robert G and Dunne, Brenda J and Dobyns, York H and Bradish, G. Johnston},
  year = {1998},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}