Skip to main content

FieldREG Anomalies in Group Situations

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Nelson, Roger D, Bradish, George J, Dobyns, York H, Dunne, Brenda J, Jahn, Robert G β€’ 1996 Modern Era β€’ psychokinesis

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

What if a crowd of people feeling the same thing could nudge the behavior of a random number machine? Researchers carried portable random event generators (basically electronic coin-flippers) into ten different group settings β€” conferences, religious ceremonies, and other gatherings. The remarkable finding: when groups were emotionally engaged together, the machines deviated from pure chance, with odds against coincidence at about 50,000 to 1. Tellingly, a dry business meeting produced zero effect, suggesting it's the shared emotional spark that matters, not just people being in a room. Effect sizes matched earlier lab experiments. This study laid the groundwork for the famous Global Consciousness Project, which would later monitor random number generators worldwide during events like September 11, 2001.

Research Notes

Foundational GCP methodology paper establishing the FieldREG paradigm for monitoring collective consciousness effects on random systems. Direct precursor to Global Consciousness Project experiments monitoring major global events (e.g., September 11, 2001). Demonstrates that non-intentional group consciousness correlates with REG anomalies, extending PEAR laboratory findings to field conditions. Only SSE Council meeting (business context) showed null results, supporting hypothesis that emotional/cognitive engagement drives effects.

Portable random event generators with software to record and index continuous sequences of binary data in field situations are found to produce anomalous outputs when deployed in various group environments. FieldREG systems operated under formal protocols in ten separate venues (professional meetings, religious rituals, group gatherings), all subdividing naturally into temporal segments. The most extreme data segments from each of the ten applications, after appropriate correction for multiple sampling, compound to a collective probability against chance expectation of 2Γ—10⁻⁡. High degrees of attention, intellectual cohesiveness, shared emotion, or other coherent qualities of the groups tend to correlate with the statistically unusual deviations. Effect sizes per bit (0.0003) and per hour (average 0.3) are similar to laboratory REG experiments.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Nelson, Roger D, Bradish, George J, Dobyns, York H, Dunne, Brenda J, Jahn, Robert G (1996). FieldREG Anomalies in Group Situations. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{nelson_1996_field_reg,
  title = {FieldREG Anomalies in Group Situations},
  author = {Nelson, Roger D and Bradish, George J and Dobyns, York H and Dunne, Brenda J and Jahn, Robert G},
  year = {1996},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}