Skip to main content

Engineering Anomalies Research

Contested
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D 1987 STAR GATE Era psychokinesis

📌 Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This is the paper that launched a thousand debates. In 1987, Princeton's PEAR lab asked whether human minds can nudge random electronic devices — psychokinesis, or "mind over matter." They tested three machines: a high-speed electronic coin-flipper, a pseudo-random source (looks random but follows a hidden pattern), and a mechanical cascade (picture a giant Plinko board). Across all three, people who intended the output to shift produced small but real effects, with odds against chance from 5,000-to-1 up to 300,000-to-1. Individual operators even showed consistent personal "signatures" that carried across devices. This foundational study became the bedrock that virtually every later mind-matter experiment built upon or tried to tear apart.

Research Notes

Foundational PEAR lab publication that established the REG paradigm, operator-signature concept, and pseudo-random source test central to the PK literature. Virtually every subsequent REG/PK paper in this library either builds on, meta-analyzes, or critiques this dataset. Speaks directly to Controversy #8 (GCP/RNG) and the Bosch et al. 2006 meta-analysis debate.

Presents the first comprehensive report from the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory, covering three PK experiment types and precognitive remote perception. Using a microelectronic REG (33 operators, >150 million bits), a deterministic pseudo-REG (10 operators, 29 series), and a Random Mechanical Cascade (22 operators, 3,072 runs), the program found small but statistically significant mean shifts in intended directions: REG dPK p < 2 × 10⁻⁴, pseudo-REG dPK p = .003, RMC dPK p = 3 × 10⁻⁶. Remote perception experiments (334 trials, 30 binary descriptors) showed anomalous information acquisition at p ≈ 10⁻¹¹, independent of spatial or temporal separation. Individual operator 'signatures' of achievement transferred across all three PK devices, suggesting effects are not device-specific.

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Psychokinesis

📋 Cite this paper
APA
Jahn, Robert G, Dunne, Brenda J, Nelson, Roger D (1987). Engineering Anomalies Research. Journal of Scientific Exploration.
BibTeX
@article{jahn_1987_engineering,
  title = {Engineering Anomalies Research},
  author = {Jahn, Robert G and Dunne, Brenda J and Nelson, Roger D},
  year = {1987},
  journal = {Journal of Scientific Exploration},
}