Skip to main content

Epistemological Implications of Near-Death Experiences and Other Non-Ordinary Mental Expressions: Moving Beyond the Concept of Altered State of Consciousness

πŸ“„ Original study β†—
Facco, Enrico, Agrillo, Christian, Greyson, Bruce β€’ 2015 Modern Era β€’ nde

πŸ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

This paper teams up Italian neuroscientists with NDE pioneer Bruce Greyson to ask a pointed question: do any of the standard brain-based explanations for near-death experiences actually hold up? They go through the usual suspects β€” oxygen-starved eyes, natural painkillers, seizure-like activity, and dream intrusion β€” and find that none of them are backed by solid clinical evidence. That's a pretty big deal. About 10-18% of people in critical condition report NDEs, and brain scans suggest these memories behave like real memories, not hallucinations. The authors argue the whole way we talk about "altered states of consciousness" is too dismissive. Instead, they propose a new label β€” "non-ordinary mental expressions" (NOMEs) β€” and call for a framework that takes both the brain data and the person's lived experience seriously, drawing on a philosophical approach called neurophenomenology.

Research Notes

Key epistemological paper bridging Facco's Padua neuroscience group with Greyson's UVA DOPS program. Provides the most systematic critique of neurobiological NDE explanations in the library and introduces the NOME concept. Central to controversy #7 (NDEs and consciousness survival). Complements Facco & Agrillo (2012) and Van Lommel (2013).

Examining epistemological implications of near-death experiences and other non-ordinary mental expressions (NOMEs), this paper critiques proposed neurobiological NDE explanations β€” retinal ischemia, endogenous opioids, temporal lobe epilepsy, NMDA receptors, and REM intrusion β€” finding each unsupported by clinical evidence. NDE incidence is 10-18% in critical-condition patients; NDE memories show theta-band EEG consistent with true episodic memory. The authors trace the mechanist-reductionist paradigm to Galileo and Descartes, proposing to replace the 'altered states of consciousness' framework with NOMEs, integrating first-person and third-person perspectives per Varela's neurophenomenology.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Nde

πŸ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Facco, Enrico, Agrillo, Christian, Greyson, Bruce (2015). Epistemological Implications of Near-Death Experiences and Other Non-Ordinary Mental Expressions: Moving Beyond the Concept of Altered State of Consciousness. Medical Hypotheses. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.004
BibTeX
@article{facco_2015_nde_epistemological,
  title = {Epistemological Implications of Near-Death Experiences and Other Non-Ordinary Mental Expressions: Moving Beyond the Concept of Altered State of Consciousness},
  author = {Facco, Enrico and Agrillo, Christian and Greyson, Bruce},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {Medical Hypotheses},
  doi = {10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.004},
}