Skip to main content

The Central Clinical Relevance of Near-Death Experiences in Acute Care Contexts

๐Ÿ“„ Original study
Michael, Pascal, Fritz, Pauline, Gosseries, Olivia, Rousseau, Anne-Franรงoise, Ancion, Aurore, Ghuysen, Alexandre, Martial, Charlotte โ€ข 2025 Current Era โ€ข nde

๐Ÿ“Œ Appears in:

Plain English Summary

When people nearly die and come back, a surprisingly large number of them report vivid near-death experiences -- around 20% of cardiac arrest survivors, and possibly over half of children who survive. These experiences often leave people profoundly changed: less afraid of death, more focused on meaning. But here's the twist -- about 14% of these experiences are actually distressing. This perspective piece from a Belgian neuroscience group argues that hospitals should stop treating NDEs as weird footnotes and start screening for them, much like they screen for delirium. They draw a fascinating parallel to psychedelic therapy, noting that the "set and setting" (your mindset and environment) may shape whether an NDE feels transcendent or terrifying. They even raise the provocative concern that sedation drugs might be suppressing beneficial NDE memories. The paper flags big blind spots too, particularly the near-total lack of research on children's and psychiatric patients' NDEs.

Research Notes

Bridges NDE phenomenology research and clinical practice from the Coma Science Group at University of Liรจge. Notable for framing NDEs as clinically actionable events rather than mere curiosities, and for the psychedelic-NDE analogy that connects to the growing psychedelic therapy literature. A perspective piece without original data, but valuable for its clinical recommendations and identification of major research gaps (pediatric NDEs, psychiatric populations).

Perspective article arguing that near-death experiences warrant systematic identification and management in emergency and intensive care settings. Reviews NDE incidence data (approximately 20% of cardiac arrest survivors, 15% of ICU survivors, and possibly 58-64% of pediatric survivors) and discusses enduring psychological impacts including reduced death anxiety, increased meaning, and post-traumatic growth, while noting that at least 14% of NDEs are distressing. Proposes incorporating NDE screening via the NDE-C scale into clinical care plans, differentiating NDEs from delirium, and attending to set-and-setting factors that may modulate NDE valence. Draws parallels with psychedelic experiences and discusses pharmacological concerns around sedation suppressing potentially beneficial NDE recall.

Links

Related Papers

Also by these authors

More in Nde

๐Ÿ“‹ Cite this paper
APA
Michael, Pascal, Fritz, Pauline, Gosseries, Olivia, Rousseau, Anne-Franรงoise, Ancion, Aurore, Ghuysen, Alexandre, Martial, Charlotte (2025). The Central Clinical Relevance of Near-Death Experiences in Acute Care Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544438
BibTeX
@article{martial_2025_nde_clinical_relevance,
  title = {The Central Clinical Relevance of Near-Death Experiences in Acute Care Contexts},
  author = {Michael, Pascal and Fritz, Pauline and Gosseries, Olivia and Rousseau, Anne-Franรงoise and Ancion, Aurore and Ghuysen, Alexandre and Martial, Charlotte},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1544438},
}