Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
📄 Original study ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Ever just known who was calling before you picked up the phone? This meta-analysis -- the most thorough number-crunching of 'telephone telepathy' experiments to date -- pooled 26 studies spanning two decades of phone, email, and text message trials. The headline result is striking: people guessed the right caller about 8.7% more often than pure luck would predict, a finding so statistically robust it hit odds of one in ten million against chance. Emotionally close pairs and people pre-screened for psychic ability performed even better. Interestingly, when tested for precognition (knowing the future) instead of telepathy, results flatlined at chance. Skeptics can still point to high variability between studies and a lack of preregistered follow-ups, keeping the debate very much alive.
Research Notes
Most complete quantitative synthesis of the telephone/email/SMS telepathy program currently in the library and a key anchor for Controversy 13. It strengthens the pro-psi aggregate case while preserving skeptical pressure points: high heterogeneity, small independent-replication subsets, and limited preregistered confirmatory follow-up.
Can people identify who is contacting them before answering when several possible callers exist? This meta-analysis pooled 26 telecommunication telepathy experiments from 15 papers (2003-2024), covering telephone, email, SMS, and automated protocols, and applied random-effects modeling (REML with Hartung adjustments). Telepathy-condition performance was 8.7% above chance (95% CI 5.3-11.9; standardized ES = 0.17, p = 1x10^-7), whereas three precognition-condition datasets were near chance. Moderator analyses showed stronger effects for preselected participants and emotionally bonded pairs, with publication-bias sensitivity checks indicating the overall signal remained significant.
Links
Related Papers
Meta Analyzes
- Experimental Tests for Telephone Telepathy — Sheldrake, Rupert (2003)
- Videotaped Experiments on Telephone Telepathy — Sheldrake, Rupert (2003)
- Who's Calling at this Hour? Local Sidereal Time and Telephone Telepathy — Lobach, Eva (2004)
- Do You Know Who Is Calling? Experiments on Anomalous Cognition in Phone Call Receivers — Schmidt, Stefan (2009)
- A Filmed Experiment on Telephone Telepathy with the Nolan Sisters — Sheldrake, Rupert (2004)
- Testing for Telepathy in Connection with E-mails — Sheldrake, Rupert (2005)
- An Automated Online Telepathy Test — Sheldrake, Rupert (2007)
- An Automated Test for Telepathy in Connection with Emails — Sheldrake, Rupert (2009)
- Sensing the Sending of SMS Messages: An Automated Test — Sheldrake, Rupert (2009)
- A Rapid Online Telepathy Test — Sheldrake, Rupert (2009)
- Telepathy in Connection with Telephone Calls, Text Messages and Emails — Sheldrake, Rupert (2014)
- Automated Tests for Telephone Telepathy Using Mobile Phones — Sheldrake, Rupert (2015)
- Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone — Wahbeh, Helané (2024)
Companion
- Detecting Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis for Extrasensory Perception Experiments in Last 20 Years — Liu, Yawen (2023)
- Stage 2 Registered Report: Anomalous Perception in a Ganzfeld Condition - A Meta-Analysis of More Than 40 Years Investigation — Tressoldi, P.E (2024)
- On the Correspondence Between Dream Content and Target Material Under Laboratory Conditions: A Meta-Analysis of Dream-ESP Studies, 1966-2016 — Storm, Lance (2017)
- A Comparison of Four New Automated Telephone Telepathy Tests — Sheldrake, Rupert (2024)
Cites
Also by these authors
Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: the transparent Psi project
Is the Sun Conscious?
Anomalous Cognition: An Umbrella Review of the Meta-Analytic Evidence
More in Telepathy
Meta-Analysis of Free-Response Studies 2009-2018: Assessing the Noise-Reduction Model Ten Years On
Can Morphic Fields Help Explain Telepathy and the Sense of Being Stared At?
EEG Correlates of Social Interaction at Distance
Brain-to-Brain (Mind-to-Mind) Interaction at Distance: A Confirmatory Study
Further Possible Physiological Connectedness Between Identical Twins: The London Study
📋 Cite this paper
Sheldrake, Rupert, Stedall, Tom, Tressoldi, Patrizio (2025). Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.31156/jaex.25934
@article{sheldrake_2025_telecommunication_telepathy_meta,
title = {Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis},
author = {Sheldrake, Rupert and Stedall, Tom and Tressoldi, Patrizio},
year = {2025},
journal = {Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition},
doi = {10.31156/jaex.25934},
}