π
2023
Rating the Persuasiveness of Empirical Evidence for the Survival of Consciousness After Bodily Death: A cross-sectional study
π Original study β Wahbeh, HelanΓ©., Delorme, Arnaud., Radin, Dean. β’ 2023 Current Era β’ overview
Also by these authors
Experimental Investigation of Precognition in Yoga Practitioners
Alibalaei, Hassan. β’ 2025
Observer Influence on Quantum Interference: Testing the von Neumann-Wigner Consciousness-Collapse Theory
Radin, Dean. β’ 2025
Who's Calling? Evaluating the Accuracy of Guessing Who Is on the Phone
Wahbeh, HelanΓ©. β’ 2024
More in Overview
Editorial: Emerging Research: Self-Ascribed Parapsychological Abilities
Simione, Luca β’ 2025
Who is calling? An Independent Replication of a Telephone Telepathy Test
Stedall, Tom. β’ 2025
Ethics Dialogue: Spelling to Communicate β Reply by Abraham Graber
Graber, Abraham. β’ 2025
Sensory processing sensitivity, transliminality, and boundary-thinness as predictors of anomalous experiences, beliefs, and abilities
Roxburgh, E. C. β’ 2024
Interrogating Neurotypical Bias in Facilitated Communication, Rapid Prompting Method, and Spelling 2 Communicate Through a Humanistic Lens
Schlosser, Ralf W. β’ 2024
π Cite this paper
APA
Wahbeh, HelanΓ©., Delorme, Arnaud., Radin, Dean. (2023). Rating the Persuasiveness of Empirical Evidence for the Survival of Consciousness After Bodily Death: A cross-sectional study. .
BibTeX
@article{wahbeh_2023_persuasiveness_survival,
title = {Rating the Persuasiveness of Empirical Evidence for the Survival of Consciousness After Bodily Death: A cross-sectional study},
author = {Wahbeh, HelanΓ©. and Delorme, Arnaud. and Radin, Dean.},
year = {2023},
journal = {},
}