Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena
⚡ Contested ↗📌 Appears in:
Plain English Summary
Here is a genuinely radical idea: what if psychokinesis — the supposed ability to move or influence objects with your mind — does not actually exist? Decision Augmentation Theory proposes that when people seem to mentally nudge random number generators (RNGs), what is really happening is precognition (glimpsing the future) steering their choices toward moments when the machine would have produced favorable results anyway. No mental force needed — just remarkably well-timed decisions. The exciting part is this is not just philosophy; the authors derived a concrete, testable prediction. Under their theory, the statistical evidence should stay constant regardless of how many random bits per trial you use, while a genuine force model predicts it should grow. They calculated you would need roughly 1,368 experimental runs to tell the two apart. If correct, every anomalous mental phenomenon collapses into one elegant mechanism: information flowing backward in time.
Research Notes
Landmark theoretical paper from the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory (SRI/SAIC program). If correct, DAT eliminates the need for any force model of PK, collapsing all micro-PK into precognition. Directly critiqued by Hyman (1996) and foundational to interpreting the PEAR RNG database and GCP results.
Introduces Decision Augmentation Theory (DAT), proposing that statistical anomalies in micro-psychokinesis experiments arise not from a mental force perturbing physical systems but from anomalous cognition (precognition) biasing human decisions toward favorable outcomes within an unperturbed world. Mathematical expressions are derived for normal and binomial distributions, yielding a key testable prediction: under DAT, the expected z² is independent of n (items per trial), whereas force-like models predict z² increases linearly with n. Statistical power curves show that ~1,368 runs at n=10⁴ suffice to separate models at 95% confidence for typical RNG effect sizes. The theory implies all anomalous mental phenomena may reduce to a single mechanism—information transfer from future to past.
Related Papers
Cites
- Does Psi Exist? Replicable Evidence for an Anomalous Process of Information Transfer — Bem, Daryl J (1994)
- Replication and Meta-Analysis in Parapsychology — Utts, Jessica (1991)
- The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective — Jahn, Robert G (1982)
- A Joint Communiqué: The Psi Ganzfeld Controversy — Hyman, Ray (1986)
- Evidence for Consciousness-Related Anomalies in Random Physical Systems — Radin, Dean I (1989)
Extended By
Cited By
- Follow-up on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Remote Viewing Experiments — Escolà-Gascón, Álex (2023)
- Assessing the Evidence for Mind-Matter Interaction Effects — Radin, Dean (2006)
- Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus — Rabeyron, Thomas (2020)
- Methods for Investigating Goal-Oriented Psi — Kennedy, J.E (1995)
- The Experimental Evidence for Parapsychological Phenomena: A Review — Cardeña, Etzel (2018)
- Apparent Association Between Effect Size in Free Response Anomalous Cognition Experiments and Local Sidereal Time — Spottiswoode, S. James P (1997)
Same Research Program
- Advances in Remote-Viewing Analysis — May, Edwin C (1990)
- A Double-Slit Diffraction Experiment to Investigate Claims of Consciousness-Related Anomalies — Ibison, Michael (1998)
- Apparent Association Between Effect Size in Free Response Anomalous Cognition Experiments and Local Sidereal Time — Spottiswoode, S. James P (1997)
- An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning — Utts, Jessica (1996)
Companion
Also by these authors
More in Methodology
Paranormal belief, conspiracy endorsement, and positive wellbeing: a network analysis
Planning Falsifiable Confirmatory Research
Addressing Researcher Fraud: Retrospective, Real-Time, and Preventive Strategies — Including Legal Points and Data Management That Prevents Fraud
Quantum Aspects of the Brain-Mind Relationship: A Hypothesis with Supporting Evidence
Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research
📋 Cite this paper
May, Edwin C, Utts, Jessica M, Spottiswoode, S. James P (1995). Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena. The Journal of Parapsychology.
@article{may_1995_decision,
title = {Decision Augmentation Theory: Toward a Model of Anomalous Mental Phenomena},
author = {May, Edwin C and Utts, Jessica M and Spottiswoode, S. James P},
year = {1995},
journal = {The Journal of Parapsychology},
}