The Varieties of Contemplative Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study of Meditation-Related Challenges in Western Buddhists
π Original study βπ Appears in:
Plain English Summary
We all hear meditation is great for you, but what happens when it goes sideways? This landmark study interviewed 60 Western Buddhist meditators and 32 meditation teachers to map out the full range of experiences people actually have during practice -- including the rough ones nobody talks about. The results are eye-opening: researchers cataloged 59 different meditation-related experiences spanning thinking, perception, emotions, bodily sensations, motivation, sense of self, and social functioning. The range ran from deeply positive to seriously distressing. A striking 73% of participants reported moderate to severe difficulties in daily functioning, 17% experienced suicidal thoughts, and 17% were hospitalized. These weren't just fragile people or extreme meditators -- the findings challenge the comforting idea that meditation only causes problems for vulnerable individuals. The study also created a framework for understanding unusual experiences that arise during contemplative practice, including those that overlap with psi (psychic-type) phenomena. One caveat: the sample was overwhelmingly White and highly educated, so these findings may not tell the whole story for everyone.
Research Notes
Foundational empirical documentation of full range of meditation effects beyond health benefits. Critical for psi research: provides taxonomy and methodology for studying contemplative anomalous experiences, distinguishes meditation-induced phenomena from pathology, contextualizes psi experiences arising during practice. Highly cited in contemplative studies and meditation safety literature. Sample highly educated (73% graduate degrees), 94% White, limits generalizability.
Mixed-methods investigation of meditation-related experiences in Western Buddhist practitioners, with deliberate focus on underreported challenging, difficult, distressing, or functionally impairing effects. Qualitative interviews with 60 practitioners (20 each from TheravΔda, Zen, Tibetan traditions) and 32 experts yielded a taxonomy of 59 meditation-related experiences across 7 domains (cognitive, perceptual, affective, somatic, conative, sense of self, social) and 26 influencing factors across 4 domains (practitioner-level, practice-level, relationships, health behaviors). Valence ranged from very positive to very negative; 73% reported moderate-severe impairment, 17% suicidality, 17% hospitalization. Causality assessment met WHO/FDA criteria (mean 4.2/6). Findings challenge assumptions that meditation difficulties only occur in vulnerable populations or intensive practice contexts.
Links
Related Papers
Companion
- When the Truth Is Out There: Counseling People Who Report Anomalous Experiences β Rabeyron, Thomas (2022)
- A Call for an Open, Informed Study of All Aspects of Consciousness β CardeΓ±a, Etzel (2014)
- Meditation Experience Is Associated with Differences in Default Mode Network Activity and Connectivity β Brewer, Judson A (2011)
More in Methodology
Paranormal belief, conspiracy endorsement, and positive wellbeing: a network analysis
Planning Falsifiable Confirmatory Research
Addressing Researcher Fraud: Retrospective, Real-Time, and Preventive Strategies β Including Legal Points and Data Management That Prevents Fraud
Quantum Aspects of the Brain-Mind Relationship: A Hypothesis with Supporting Evidence
Paranormal beliefs and cognitive function: A systematic review and assessment of study quality across four decades of research
π Cite this paper
Lindahl, Jared R, Fisher, Nathan E, Cooper, David J, Rosen, Rochelle K, Britton, Willoughby B (2017). The Varieties of Contemplative Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study of Meditation-Related Challenges in Western Buddhists. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176239
@article{lindahl_2017_varieties_contemplative,
title = {The Varieties of Contemplative Experience: A Mixed-Methods Study of Meditation-Related Challenges in Western Buddhists},
author = {Lindahl, Jared R and Fisher, Nathan E and Cooper, David J and Rosen, Rochelle K and Britton, Willoughby B},
year = {2017},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0176239},
}